![]() What Congress wants to see is more gradual development and proof of concept before it commits serious funding, Kilby told reporters after his remarks. “So we have been working with the acquisition community to roll out a test and competence program so we can get something to the war fighter that they’re confident they can use.” “And when we brief this, we go right to the upper right-hand corner of the difficulty spectrum. Jim Kilby, the deputy chief of naval operations for war-fighting requirements and capabilities. “I don’t want to be Pollyannaish about this: It’s going to be hard work,” said Vice Adm. In October, the Navy’s top requirements officer told an audience at the Expeditionary Warfare Conference in Annapolis, Maryland, that the platform will be difficult to develop. Navy leaders have publicly acknowledged congressional skepticism. The Navy recently emerged from a bruising fight with Congress over its designs for integrating unmanned technology into the surface force. Ultimately the group’s work is intended to help inform acquisition requirements.Ī classified Pentagon maritime drone program is about to get its moment in the sun The group is directed to have a first draft by February and a final draft prepared by September of this year. The group is to examine command and control for the platforms, as well as potential challenges with interoperability and communications examine issues with basing, maintaining and supporting the new platforms look at what the vessels will need in terms of sensors, computers and various supporting systems and look at what kind of training and personnel will be needed to support unmanned operations. The concepts of operations is meant to define what would be considered “initial operating capability” for the medium and large USVs and goes on to define what those platforms are intended to do. Ultimately Congress appropriated funds for the Navy to buy two large unmanned surface vessels, but lawmakers forbade the service from equipping the vessels with vertical launch tubes, as the Navy intended. The message comes after a long battle with Congress over funding for unmanned surface combatants, during which lawmakers expressed skepticism that the Navy was knowledgeable enough about the technology for which it was seeking funding. ![]() Pacific Fleet, directs the surface fleet’s Surface Development Squadron to develop concepts for “the organization, manning, training, equipping, sustaining, and the introduction and operational integration of the Medium Unmanned Surface Vehicle and Large Unmanned Surface Vessel with individual afloat units as well as with Carrier Strike Groups, Expeditionary Strike Groups, and Surface Action Groups.” The message, which was coordinated with U.S. Navy’s Fleet Forces Command has ordered the service’s surface force to develop a concept of operations for both the large and medium unmanned surface vessels in development, according to a Dec. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |